CONTRIBUTORS

F. Character & Social/Cognitive/Moral Psychology > Foundations of Metacognition by M. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner & J. Proust (OUP, 2012)

"Metacognition refers to the awareness an individual has of their own mental processes (also referred to as ’ thinking about thinking’)." t seems to me that there is a profound difference between epistemic internalism and metacognition as understood especially in the outstanding work of the scholars at the Institut Jean Nicod in Paris. Although some virtue epistemologists like Reza Lahroodi have done work on the intersections of VE and metacognition, the distinction seems to be lost on many others for whom "responsibilism" is wedded to assumptions of internalism.

Much of the work of Proust and others working there are highly relevant to the efforts of virtue epistemologist to appropriate studies of metacognition while distancing themselves the overt intellectualism of internalist evidentialism, together with its conflation of issues of doxastic justification with personal justification. Now a new collection of essays explains the foundations of metacognition from interdisciplinary perspectives.

"In the past thirty years metacognition research has become a rapidly growing field of interdisciplinary research within the cognitive sciences. Just recently, there have been major changes in this field, stimulated by the controversial issues of metacognition in nonhuman animals and in early infancy. Consequently the question what defines a metacognitive process has become a matter of debate : how should one distinguish between simple minds that are not yet capable of any metacognitive processing, and minds with a more advanced architecture that exhibit such a capacity ? Do nonhuman animals process the ability to monitor their own mental actions ? If metacognition is unique to humans, then at what stage in development does it occur, and how can we distinguish between cognitive and metacognitive processes ?


The Foundations of Metacognition brings together leading cognitive scientists to consider these questions. It explores them from three different perspectives : from an evolutionary point of view the authors ask whether there is sufficient evidence that some non-human primates or other animals monitor their mental states and thereby exhibit a form of metacognition. From a developmental perspective the authors ask when children start to monitor, evaluate und control their own minds. And from a philosophical point of view the main issue is how to draw the line between cognitive and metacognitive processes, and how to integrate the different functions in which metacognition is involved into a single coherent picture of the mind. The foundations of metacognition - whatever they will turn out to be - have to be as complex as this pattern of connections we discover in its effects.

Bringing together researchers from across the cognitive sciences, the book is valuable for philosophers of mind, developmental and comparative psychologists, and neuroscientists."

Book details and an open-access to the Introduction, on the epistemology of metacognition is available at
http://fds.oup.com/www.oup.com/pdf/13/9780199646739_prelim.pdf
January 26, 2013 | Registered CommenterGuy Axtell