CONTRIBUTORS

E. Education; Philosophy of Deliberative Democracy > Fabienne Peter on "The Procedural Epistemic Value of Deliberation"

Fabienne Peter has a recent article in Synthese, that ties or relates the procedural value of practical/collective deliberation to the second-person perspective, and to deliberative virtues such as "reciprocity" (Rawls, 1993), "mutual accountability" (Darwall, 2006), and "equal respect" (Larmore, 2008). A very interesting 'value-driven' approach.

Abstract. Collective deliberation is fuelled by disagreements and its epistemic value depends, inter alia, on how the participants respond to each other in disagreements. I use this accountability thesis to argue that deliberation may be valued not just instrumentally but also for its procedural features. The instrumental epistemic value of deliberation depends on whether it leads to more or less accurate beliefs among the
participants. The procedural epistemic value of deliberation hinges on the relationships of mutual accountability that characterize appropriately conducted deliberation. I will argue that it only comes into view from the second-person standpoint. I shall explain what the second-person standpoint in the epistemic context entails and how it compares to Stephen Darwall’s interpretation of the second-person standpoint in
ethics.

Keywords: Social epistemology · Proceduralism · Second-person standpoint

Find at source: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11229-012-0119-6
April 3, 2013 | Registered CommenterGuy Axtell